Showing posts with label EU Referendum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU Referendum. Show all posts

Monday, April 14, 2008

Irish Government in EU Referendum Deception Furore

It seems that leopards can never change their spots. According to an article in today's Irish Daily Mail, the Irish government is planning an elaborate campaign of deception in the run-up to their referendum on the EU Constitution Lisbon Treaty.

The Government has hatched an elaborate plan to deceive voters over the forthcoming EU treaty referendum, the Irish Daily Mail can today reveal. A leaked email shows that ministers are planning a deliberate campaign of misinformation to ensure the treaty vote is passed when it is put to the public as required by the Constitution. The document also shows that the Government is considering a last-minute change in the date of the referendum - slated for June 12 - to catch out 'No' campaigners.

Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern has even been personally assured that the European Commission will 'tone down or delay' any announcements from Brussels 'that might be unhelpful'. Alarmingly, the email says that Ministers ruled out an October referendum, which would have been better procedurally, because they feared 'unhelpful developments during the French Presidency - particularly related to EU defence'.

This suggestion will raise grave fears that the State's constitutional commitment to military neutrality could be undermined by the Lisbon treaty - a rehashed version of the failed EU Constitution. The memo was sent to the British Government by Elizabeth Green, a senior UK diplomat in Dublin, following a briefing from Dan Mulhall, a top official in the Department of Foreign affairs. Its aim was to relay to her political masters in London the lengths to which the Irish government was going to ensure a "yes' vote in the referndum. Ireland is the only EU state which is allowing voters a say on the treaty, and European heads of state are terrified that they will reject the treaty.

Campaigners say that the new treaty could remove Ireland's powers to decide its own tax rates and social policies. However the most controversial aspect from an Irish point of view is the likelihood that the treaty will be used to advance the concept of a 'European army', which would violate the principle of neutrality which has been a foundation-stone of the State since its inception. France is particularly keen to advance the notion of an EU force, which critics fear could be ordered into action over Irish objections by a majority vote of EU heads of state.

Already concerns have been raised that the Irish peacekeeping force being sent to Chad could be compromised by French political and military objectives in the area. The leaked email admits that this is one of the issues which needs to be kept from Irish voters, saying that the possibility of the French speaking out on this issue meant the referndum could not be delayed until the
autumn.

'Mulhall said a date in October would have been easier from a procedural point of view. But the risk of unhelpful developments during the French Presidency - particularly related to EU defence - were just too great. Sarkozy was completely unpredictable.' The Irish official also worried that the latest World Trade Organisation talks, which have already aroused the fury of Irish farmers, could turn the voters against the new treaty. Farmers are suppliers are planning a one-day shutdown this week to protest at the tack taken by EU trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson. The email said that Mulhall was concerned about 'a WTO deal based on agricultural concessions that could lead the powerful farming association to withdraw its support.'

However Irish ministers appear to be basing their hopes on the fact that the treaty cannot be read or understood by most voters - and that launching a snap referendum would stop them from doing so. 'Most people would not have time to study the text and would go with the politicians they tusted,' it says. And it points out that the Government plans to keep people from analysing the detail, saying the 'aim is to focus the campaign on overall benefits of the EU rather than the treaty itself.' It then explains the details of the referendum Bill, which it says was 'agreed following lengthy consultation with government lawyers and with the political parties' but which it admits is 'largely incomprehensible to the lay reader.'

The memo details plans to fool campaigners over the date, which has been widely touted as falling on June 12. The memo states: 'Irish have picked 29 May for voting but will delay an announcement to keep the no camp guessing... the Taoiseach and Ahern saw a slight advantage in keeping the no camp guessing.' And it adds that the EC was doing its best to keep any bad news from the Irish public. 'Mulhall said other partners - including the Commission - were playing a helpful, low-profile role. It said that during a trip to Dublin, Vice-President Margot Wallstrom 'had told Dermot Ahern that the Commission was willing to tone down or delay messages that might be unhelpful.' The leaked email also points out that most Irish media have been supine on the issue, saying: 'Mulhall remarked that the media had been relatively quiet on the ratification process so far. We would need to remain in close touch given the media crossover.'

I wonder what impact this will have on the Irish electorate.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Well I'm Convinced, How About You?!



It may have escaped your notice that there is an EU Referendum campaign underway in the Republic of Ireland. Here are two posters by the Yes campaign. Disgraceful. Outrageous. Sexist. And very, very effective. Perhaps someone could design something similar for Boris.

By the way, I gave my modelling fee to charidee :)

Friday, February 15, 2008

Will Nick Clegg Act Tough Over Rebel MP?

The LibDems seem to be having a little local difficulty over their continuing opposition to a referendum on the EU Treaty - which, of course they promised in their 2005 manifesto. Frontbenchers David Heath and Nick Harvcey have courageously said they support such a referendum and are now being threatened with the sack from Nick Clegg's team. There is a big debate going on among LibDem bloggers about the rights and wrongs of this. Norfolk Blogger is holding a poll. Even the normally ultra-loyal LibDem Voice has carried a questioning article. Antony Hook wants him to stay. Willow Man wants David Heath gone. He writes...

Well, what does he expect? A pat on the back? He goes out of his way to give a quote to the Western Daily Press saying that he would defy the party line over the Lisbon treaty and vote in favour of a referendum. Then what does he do? He tries to justify his act of act of betrayal by saying that he doesn't want to let down the voters or go back on what he promised. Crap! What about letting down the party and Nick Clegg? You do remember Nick Clegg don't you Mr Heath? He was the man we elected LEADER just before Christmas... The last thing this party needs are loose canons. It's about time Mr Heath learnt the the hard way that "There is no 'I' in 'team."

So what's it to be Mr Clegg?