Sunday, November 04, 2007

Eleanor Daniels 1933-2007


Eleanor Daniels, my beloved Godmother, died last night in an NHS hospice in Cambridge. Three weeks ago she was admitted to Addenbrooke's Hospital. No one at the time could have believed that she would have been taken from us in such a short time.

Eleanor was born in 1933. From the age of two years old she became my mother's lifelong best friend. They attended the same school at Haverhill in Suffolk and their friendship endured when my mother moved to Norfolk. She trained to become a teacher and spent more than thirty years teaching Domestic Science at my old school, the County High in Saffron Walden.

From the day I was born she became the most important person to me outside my immediate family. She stayed at our house every Tuesday night and during the school holidays we'd all troop off in her Morris Minor for countless day trips to the coast or a visitor attraction. She was a second mother to my two sisters and me and we all worshipped her. She never married and we were the children she never had, I suppose.

She lived with her parents in a small village outside Saffron Walden, Little Chesterford. She was on the village hall committee, on the parish council and a leading light in the local Garden Club. It must have been her that John Major was referring to when he talked about old maids, cycling along the country lanes to church. She took her village duties incredibly seriously and it is a matter of huge regret that she never got to see the card which 30 villagers sent to her in hospital, each writing their own message of love and support.

Eleanor was a rock in my life. I could tell her things I could tell no one else. She bailed me out on several occasions in my younger years when I was on my financial uppers. She gave me wise advice which was always appreciated. In short, she was the perfect Godmother.

When I went too see her on Monday to say good-bye I admit I didn't want to go. I was warned that she didn't look like the Eleanor we all knew and loved. I admit I was a coward, and just wanted to remember her as she always was - vibrant, laughing, funny, caring. I got to the door and didn't want to go into the room. My sister Tracey went in before me and as I was about to enter the room she gave me a look which said "you will be shocked by what you see". She was stronger than me.
Eleanor lay there and looked exactly like her mother, who died 25 years ago. She could barely talk. I hugged her, almost howling my eyes out. "Stop it, stop it," I thought to myself. "For goodness sake, be strong". Eleanor whispered in my ear "Don't upset yourself, don't upset yourself," as ever caring for others before herself. I sat there for three hours holding her hand until my hand was almost numb. She drifted in and out of consciousness. From time to time my grief overwhelmed me and I would cry. My sisters cried too as we comforted each other. How could this world be so cruel, to make someone so good suffer like this? Tracey told her how much we loved her and how grateful we were for everything she had done for us. She played a huge part in making the three of us who we are today. It was then time to go. I hugged her, kissed her, told her how much I loved her. I got to the door, looked back and then did it all over again. I will remember that moment for ever. I got out into the corridor and howled my eyes out.
I never saw her again. But I did speak to her. On Thursday afternoon Tracey phoned to say they thought she was about to slip away. Sheena put the phone to Eleanor's ear and I said good-bye again. But she wasn't quite ready to go and hung on for two more days.

Sheena and Tracey both went to see Eleanor yesterday morning. They knew the end was near, but because they knew I was doing News 24 last night they didn't want to tell me how bad Eleanor's condition had become. I went to see Yasmin Alibhai-Brown's theatre show in Brentford on the way to the BBC. At 8.30 I saw I had a missed call from my parent's phone. I just knew.

It turned out that my sisters had taken their kids to the village fireworks. The call came from the hospice just as the first rocket whizzed into the sky. The symbolism was striking. Yes, there were tears last night, but they were tears of relief as much as tears of grief. None of us wanted Eleanor to suffer any longer. We wanted her to take her place among the angels. And as the rocket soared into the night sky, that's just what she did.

My sister Sheena has been an absolute heroine over the last three weeks. She still lives near my parents and has been with Eleanor every step of the way, sometimes for twelve hours at a time. Tracey and I know what she's had to take on and we love her all the more for it. And it's heartbreaking that she now has to cope with the fact that her partner's mother had a major stroke on Wednesday and may also have a very short time to live.

I know this blog is for political discussion, but it is also a diary. Some may regard this post as pure self indulgence on my part. But you are my community. There are some things I feel the need to share. Most of you have never even met me. But because you read me most days we have some sort of bond. The messages on the thread earlier in the week, and your private emails, were of great comfort to me and my family. We all thank you for your kind words and good wishes.
As we now all prepare for Eleanor's funeral we take today to remember this fine woman.

Saturday, November 03, 2007

A Sad Evening

I apologise that I haven't posted anything this weekend, and I am afraid that won't change tomorrow either. Those of you who read THIS post about my Godmother Eleanor earlier this week will know what a difficult few days it has been for my family. Eleanor died peacefully this evening. I'll write more about her tomorrow, but I hope everyone will understand if I don't really feel like engaging in political knock-about just at the moment.

Weekend Open Thread

Apologies for the lack of activity today (again). I'm with my family in Essex and they have no internet access. Even my 3G card won't work. And my Blackberry still won't receive email, although I have just discovered it can send it, hence I can do this post. Actually, after the cold turkey of the first 24 hours, it has been rather nice not to be addicted to my Crackberry and check email every time the red light flashes.

Last night's event in Dagenham was a fantastic success and raised £4,000 for Simon Jones's campaign fund. It was a little offputting during my speech to be constantly interrupted by a drunk woman constantly talking. She seemed to have a skirt on which, shall we say, left little to the imagination. Luckily, I don't have much of an imagination.

Tonight, before I do the paper review on News 24 at 11.45pm I am - brace yourselves - going to see Yasmin Alibhai-Brown's one woman show in Brentford. I'm not exactly sure what to expect but I will report back tomorrow! I know the mention of Yasmin's name usually excites a frenzy, so do calm yourselves in the comments.

Friday, November 02, 2007

Friday Open Thread

Today I'm giving a speech in Surrey to 20 NHS PCT Chief Executives on public policy reform and this evening I'm talking to Dagenham & Rainham Conservatives. I was a bit worried when I was told they were charging £40 a ticket and thought I might have an audience of two. But all credit to them; they have sold more than 60 tickets. My friend Simon Jones is the candidate there so it will help him raise money for his campaign to oust Jon Cruddas.

So I am likely to have very little time to blog today. My Blackberry has for some reason stopped receiving emails. Vodafone say that its the fault of my email providers and they say it's Vodafone's fault.

So let' s have an open thread today. I will approve comments as often as I can. Discuss what you like, but keep it fair please.

Alex Deane: Report from the Aussie Election Day 19

CAMPAIGN DAY 19 – 22 TO GO

Blunder shall be followed by blunder, it seems. Today it was Peter Garrett’s turn.

It is fair to say that Garrett is an eccentric. He’s about 25 feet tall, bald as a coot and a former rock star with an Australian band. He has been known for decades as an outspoken environmental campaigner. More recently, as the Member for Kingsford Smith, he’s been squeezing himself into bland suits and party lines. Until today, that is.

Here’s the background. Though he denies it, Kevin Rudd has been accused several times during this campaign (and indeed before it) of adopting a “me too” political approach – i.e. he has frequently agreed with the government as announcements have been made. Ahead in the polls, he has sought to avoid being on the wrong side of a policy divide by playing a “small target” game; he is wary of the so-called “wedge” politics supposedly pursued so effectively against his predecessors by Howard, whereby they were forced to show differing positions on controversial issues that were ultimately less popular than the government’s position with a majority of voters. Just avoid doing anything too high profile, the thinking supposedly goes, and he can coast into office.

So, Garrett (who erstwhile environmentalist allies accuse of having sold out to tow party lines, and might therefore (a) feel frustrated and (b) have an agenda rather different to the party line that he’d like to unleash once in power) finds himself rowed up at Melbourne Airport by a journalist early in the day in an informal setting. The journalist says, this is all just “me tooism”. He replies:

“Yeah… but once we get in we’ll just change it all.”

The true face of Labor, cries the Coalition – they’re just pretending to be reasonable and uncontroversial and like us, to get in. Then, the real left will emerge.

Labor denies it, and to be fair, whilst their tax policy had a great big whiff of plagiarismo about it, their general platform – on Iraq, on industrial reform etc – is different to ours. They suggest that Garrett was only joking.

Either way, it’s certainly another embarrassing story from Garrett for Labor in the middle of a hard-fought campaign, which is undesirable for them. They are running an ultra-disciplined campaign, with their left buttoned down in much the same fashion the right of the Conservative Party constrains itself under Cameron in the UK – and for much the same reason; they’re desperate to get in and get rid of a loathed long-serving government. This is a disappointing chink in that armour for them – and perhaps symptomatic of wider feeling in the ALP…

Pretty tired now.

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Brown Reheats Failed Schools Announcement

Gordon Brown's speech yesterday on closing failing schools was yet another example of his lack of vision. This wasn't a new policy - as is so often the case nowadays, it was a reheated one. It was actually announced in the Queen's Speech in 2005, more than two years ago. Indeed, it was first trailed in the Independent in THIS article on February 8 2005.

UPDATE: It seems I was far too kind on our visionary PM. It seems there were many earlier examples of this same policy announcement...

In 1995, David Blunkett, Labour’s education spokesman, said: 'A school identified as failing would be closed and a new school would be reopened on the same site for a new school year. The new school, with a new governing body, new teachers and a new head teacher, would be able to offer pupils a fresh chance for success.’ (The Times, 12 April 1995).

The Labour manifesto in 1997 stated: ‘All Local Education Authorities (LEAs) must demonstrate that every school is improving. For those failing schools unable to improve, ministers will order a 'fresh start' - close the school and start afresh on the same site.’

In 1998 it was announced ‘Schools are to be given a maximum of two years to turn around poor performance under proposals announced by the UK Government. Those which fail to improve sufficiently face closure. They would then either re-open under a new headteacher and governors or remain shut for good, with their pupils transferred to better performing schools’ Education Secretary David Blunkett said: ‘Persistent delay in improvement damages the life chances of the youngsters involved…The new procedures will provide both clarity and certainty for schools whilst making clear that we cannot tolerate consistent failure’ (BBC News online, 2 June 1998).

In 2000, Education Secretary Estelle Morris said: ‘The Government’s approach to tackling failing schools is clearly working for most schools… It is crucial that local education authorities take tough decisions on failing schools.’ (DFEE Press Release, 1 December 2000).

In March 2000, the Government announced ‘in future, where schools over three consecutive years failed to get 5 good GCSE passes for at least 15 per cent of their pupils, they would be considered for a Fresh Start.’ David Blunkett added: ‘Our Fresh Start policy - the closure of a school and the replacement with a new school - is already being used by LEAs to tackle failing schools and is beginning to have an impact.’ (DFEE Press Release 15 March 2000).

Sir Ian Blair Must Go

The verdict in the de Menezes case today has many implications, not least for police operational procedures. There was no personal culpability on any of the officers in charge, or Cressida Dick, who directed the operation. However, the Judge was damning in his comments on the way the police conducted themselves. He said it was a "corporate failure, not an individual failure." As Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Ian Blair is in charge of the force as a "corporate body". The buck stops with him. He has to take ultimate responsibility for one of the most grotesque failures of modern policing in recent times. The LibDems have already called for him to resign. I agree. UPDATE: David Davis has also now called on Sir Ian Blair to go. He said...
There is something wrong with a process of accountability that, two years on, continues to prevent the publication of the review of the events leading up to 22 July 2005. Health and Safety legislation is an inappopriate mechanism for scrutinising a counter-terrorism operation - and risks a counter-productive impact on policing. However, the trial has shed light on the serial failures that led to the tragic death of Mr De Menezes. They include failures of organisation, command and operations. The failures were systemic, falling within the clear responsibility of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. His position is now untenable, in light of these findings and the overriding need to restore public confidence. We think the jury is right to say Cressida Dick should not be blamed for this failure. Neither, should the frontline officers, because this was a serial failure of organisation, training, tactics and resourcing. Only one person can be held overall accountable for that.

David Cracknell Leaves Sunday Times

The merry-go-round in the political lobby will start cranking itself up again with the news that the political editor of the Sunday Times David "Crackers" Cracknell is leaving to join ailing lobbying company LLM, part of the Financial Dynamics Group. He will take on the new role of Chairman, reporting to FD's CEP Charles Watson. LLM has seen a string of departures this year, with one of its co-founders, Jon Mendelsohn becoming Head of Fundraising for the Labour Party. The LibDem candidate in the Bromley by-election has also moved on.

Political Editor of the Sunday Times is one of the plum jobs in the lobby. It would be invidious of me to tip who might get it, so let's do it! If I were the editor of the Sunday Times (and that is a delicious thought, is it not?) my shortlist would consist of Francis Elliott, Ben Brogan, Fraser Nelson, Colin Brown and Patrick O'Flynn. Which, of course, guarantees none of them stand a chance.

Featherstone on LibDem Hustings

I had intended to go to the LibDem media leadership hustings last night, but sadly I had a subsequent engagement. However, I have learned all I need to know from Lynne Featherstone, Chris Huhne's chief cheerleader, HERE. She can't quite bring herself to slag off Nick Clegg, but you don't have to read between too many lines.

Hattip Justin Hinchcliffe

Olly Kendall has written an article on CiF on the dangers of political betting (the activity, not the site) and whether there should be a code of conduct for candidates betting on themselves or their opponents. Read it HERE.

October Stats: Overtaking Guido


This month has been the second best ever on the blog with a record 276,072 unique visitors, nearly 20% up on the best ever previous month, July. Page impressions were also a massive 519,104, which is 110,000 more than July and more than double October 2006. Absolute unique visitors is now more than 55,000, which is almost double the circulation of the New Statesman and approaching that of The Spectator (the print versions).

For the first time ever I have had more traffic than Guido, a fact he comments on HERE. Triumphalist? Moi?

Here are my top 20 linking sites (ie incoming hits) for October. All these sites referred at least 200 people here. The arrows denote whether a site has moved up or down or stayed static since September...
1. ConservativeHome 15.7% ↑ 2. Guido Fawkes 10.5% ↓ 3. PoliticalBetting 7.5% ↔ 4. Spectator Coffee House 2.5% ↑ 5. Biased BBC 1.85% ↔ 6. Dizzy Thinks 1.7% ↑ 7. Daniel Finkelstein ↑ 8. Bloggerheads ↑ 9. Daily Referendum 10. UK Polling Report ↑ 11. Paul Linford 12. Ed Clarke ↔ 13. Witanagemot ↓ 14. W4MP ↓ Devil's Kitchen ↑ 15. Luke Akehurst ↓ 16. Archbishop Cranmer ↑ 17. Islington Newmania ↑ 18. Mikey's Tent of Reality ↑ 19. Bel is Thinking NEW 20. Not a Sheep NEW

Alex Deane: Report from the Aussie Election Day 18

CAMPAIGN DAY 18 – 23 TO GO

There’s no hiding it. Yesterday was a bad day. There were three main reasons for this:

- Tony Abbott publicly abused a dying man
- Tony Abbott turned up half an hour late to his own debate.
- Tony Abbott audibly swore at his debate opponent.

Tony Abbott is the Health Minister. All this also resulted in no media coverage for our $400 million hospitals plan. We will be hoping that the focus today shifts from Tony Abbott and back onto policy. Or, indeed, anything else.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Living by the Sword

I have to admit that I am not a fan of Heather Mills-McCartney. As Kelvin Mackenzie has just said on 5 Live, she is utterly devoid of charm and a sense of humour. Her media appearances today have done her no favours at all. She strikes me as being on the verge of a breakdown. And lashing out at the press will do her no good at all. All it will achieve is a tabloid backlash. She will no doubt say that it will prove her point. I think she protests a little too much. She used the media when it suited her. Indeed, she used to write the very kind of tabloid column about which she now complains so vociferously. There are several words for people like her. I'll leave you to imagine what they might be.

No Election (And No Blogging Today!)


I'll be on Radio 5 Live tonight with Rochard Bacon from 11.30pm until 1am. Busy day. Sorry for lack of blogging.
******************************************************************
COMING TOMORROW: Election 2007: The Day After - A Counterfactual
******************************************************************

Nadine Dorries Accuses Select Committee

Tory MP Nadine Dorries has accused the Science & Technology Select Committee of being "hijacked" by "powerful vested interests" in the abortion 'industry'. She has released a minority report which can be read HERE. She concludes her statement...
MPs have not been given the opportunity to consider all the evidence that could
have been made available. The facts have been shadowed and the report has been
hijacked by those with powerful vested financial interests in the abortion
industry.

This is controversial stuff. More on Nadine's blog HERE.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Gordon Brown's Trick or Treat


Tomorrow, Halloween, would have been the eve of Election Day if Gordon Brown had had the guts to call one. On Halloween the Conservatives are launching this poster, which they're putting in regional newspapers and on ad-vans.

Nick Clegg Support(ed) an EU Constitution Referendum

Nick Clegg is against a referendum on the EU Reform Treaty. How does he square that stance with this unequivocal backing for a referendum on the Constitution, written for Guardian Online in October 2003. He knows the Reform Treaty and the Constitution are more or less the same thing, as Giscard D'Estaing has reaffirmed in a French newspaper today. This is what Clegg wrote four years ago...

The real reason, of course, why the government does not want to hold a referendum is the fear that it may lose. It is the same fear that has paralysed Blair on the euro for six long years. It is the same fear that led Peter Hain to camouflage the constitution with comic inaccuracy as nothing more than a "tidying up exercise". It is the same fear which has long restrained New Labour from expressing the courage of its meagre convictions on Europe. And it won't do.

The alternative, now unfolding before us, is infinitely worse: a false assumption that anti-Europeans are democrats, and pro-Europeans are not. By shilly shallying with semantic half-truths about the content of the constitution, and now haughtily dismissing all calls for a referendum, it is New Labour which is, to cite my friend, "playing straight into the hands of the Eurosceptics". By providing the hapless Iain Duncan Smith with a pretext to champion people's democracy, Blair is unwittingly doing more to reinvigorate Euroscepticism than John Redwood could manage in his wildest fantasies. Nothing will do more damage to the pro-European movement than giving room to the suspicion that we have something to hide, that we do not have the "cojones" to carry our argument to the people.

And our argument is strong. The constitution, assuming it emerges roughly in its present draft form, provides ideal ammunition to call the Europhobes' bluff. While it is no mere "tidying up exercise", it is galaxies away from the "blueprint for tyranny" laughably paraded by the Daily Mail...

...The measured modesty of the constitution is precisely what is being obscured by the government's refusal to hold a referendum. In doing so, it has allowed the phobes to shift the argument away from the constitution itself and onto shriller claims about the democratic legitimacy of the whole EU. By forcing the phobes to argue on the substance of the text, a referendum would expose the hollow hysteria of their polemic.

Naive? Perhaps, a little. Inevitably, any referendum campaign is unlikely to be a scholarly examination of the legal content of a complex constitutional tome. It is possible that it will soon escalate into an unconstrained debate about the very place of Britain in the EU - in or out. So be it.


Read the full article HERE. Hattip to LibDem Voice. They know not what they do.

How to Earn £139,000 a Month


Ever wondered what a Premiership player's payslip looks like? Well here's the payslip of a Liverpool player (not one of their top stars) for April this year. Net pay of £82,413.67, which equates to a gross monthly wage of more than £139,000. Nice work if you can get it. (Click on the image to enlarge it).
UPDATE: I got it wrong. It's £83,000 a week, not a month!!! Having done a Google search, it seems this is doing the rounds on football related websites. I haven't identified the player, but others haven't been so reluctant.

Gove on Gordon

Michael Gove's speech today to Policy Exchange was brilliant. It's the best dissection of Gordon Brown's record, his character and his future I've yet seen. Read it HERE.

Labour Refuses to Back Cut in Trade Union Donations


Our friends at the First Post need to get a new "Westminster insider", who seems to believe that Lord Ashcroft is actually Lord Ashdown. However, let's move on to the substance of their story, which is that with the party funding talks having broken down, Gordon Brown will now move to restrict the ability of parties to spend money in target seats between elections. They reckon he will introduce a short Bill, no doubt called the "How to stuff the Tories (Amendment) Bill.
Let us remember though, how we got here. The only reason the talks over party funding broke down was because the Labour Party refused to agree that the Trade Unions should, like individuals and businesses, be subject to the same £50,000 donation limit. It really is quite that simple. Jack Straw has bleated this evening:
We greatly regret that these talks have been suspended as a result of the
Conservative Party's unwillingness to negotiate on a draft agreement. We had
understood that all parties had thought in good faith that this draft agreement
was the basis of a comprehensive settlement. We will now take time to reflect on
next steps.
The Conservative Party rightly said that unless the government was willing to discuss trade union donations there would be no point in discussing anything further. Francis Maude said:
We are disappointed that the trade unions still hold Labour over a barrel. The
unions are running the Labour party from the back seat, giving them control over
Government policy. Labour has rejected a comprehensive cap on donations and
clearly do not want to end the big donor culture which has caused the 'cash for
honours' scandal. Labour just want a backroom deal that gives them taxpayers'
cash without proper reform. This would do nothing to restore public trust in our
democracy.
Quite. I am an opponent of any further expansion of taxpayer funding for political parties. Politicians should get the message that the public just will not put up with them sticking their mits further into our pockets.

Why the Milibands Had to Go to America to Adopt

Good luck to the Milibands with the adoption of their second son. However, we really need to ask why they had to go to America to adopt both their children. The reason is simple. If you are over 35 years of age in this country it is difficult in the extreme to adopt a child. Such parents are considered unsuitable. Excuse me? My sister had her only daughter at the ripe old age of 38. Is it really suggested that she is an unsuitable parent because she left it late in life to have a child? If her biological clock hadn't been in such good nick and she couldn't have had a child naturally, she would have found it almost impossible to adopt in this country. Unlike the Milibands she could not have gone to the US to adopt because she wouldn't have been able to afford it.

We really need to revisit this issue, and David Miliband ought to take a leading part in the discussions.