
political commentator * author * publisher * bookseller * radio presenter * blogger * Conservative candidate * former lobbyist * Jack Russell owner * West Ham United fanatic * Email iain AT iaindale DOT com
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Eleanor Daniels 1933-2007

Saturday, November 03, 2007
A Sad Evening
Weekend Open Thread
Last night's event in Dagenham was a fantastic success and raised £4,000 for Simon Jones's campaign fund. It was a little offputting during my speech to be constantly interrupted by a drunk woman constantly talking. She seemed to have a skirt on which, shall we say, left little to the imagination. Luckily, I don't have much of an imagination.
Tonight, before I do the paper review on News 24 at 11.45pm I am - brace yourselves - going to see Yasmin Alibhai-Brown's one woman show in Brentford. I'm not exactly sure what to expect but I will report back tomorrow! I know the mention of Yasmin's name usually excites a frenzy, so do calm yourselves in the comments.
Friday, November 02, 2007
Friday Open Thread
So I am likely to have very little time to blog today. My Blackberry has for some reason stopped receiving emails. Vodafone say that its the fault of my email providers and they say it's Vodafone's fault.
So let' s have an open thread today. I will approve comments as often as I can. Discuss what you like, but keep it fair please.
Alex Deane: Report from the Aussie Election Day 19
Blunder shall be followed by blunder, it seems. Today it was Peter Garrett’s turn.
It is fair to say that Garrett is an eccentric. He’s about 25 feet tall, bald as a coot and a former rock star with an Australian band. He has been known for decades as an outspoken environmental campaigner. More recently, as the Member for Kingsford Smith, he’s been squeezing himself into bland suits and party lines. Until today, that is.
Here’s the background. Though he denies it, Kevin Rudd has been accused several times during this campaign (and indeed before it) of adopting a “me too” political approach – i.e. he has frequently agreed with the government as announcements have been made. Ahead in the polls, he has sought to avoid being on the wrong side of a policy divide by playing a “small target” game; he is wary of the so-called “wedge” politics supposedly pursued so effectively against his predecessors by Howard, whereby they were forced to show differing positions on controversial issues that were ultimately less popular than the government’s position with a majority of voters. Just avoid doing anything too high profile, the thinking supposedly goes, and he can coast into office.
So, Garrett (who erstwhile environmentalist allies accuse of having sold out to tow party lines, and might therefore (a) feel frustrated and (b) have an agenda rather different to the party line that he’d like to unleash once in power) finds himself rowed up at Melbourne Airport by a journalist early in the day in an informal setting. The journalist says, this is all just “me tooism”. He replies:
“Yeah… but once we get in we’ll just change it all.”
The true face of Labor, cries the Coalition – they’re just pretending to be reasonable and uncontroversial and like us, to get in. Then, the real left will emerge.
Labor denies it, and to be fair, whilst their tax policy had a great big whiff of plagiarismo about it, their general platform – on Iraq, on industrial reform etc – is different to ours. They suggest that Garrett was only joking.
Either way, it’s certainly another embarrassing story from Garrett for Labor in the middle of a hard-fought campaign, which is undesirable for them. They are running an ultra-disciplined campaign, with their left buttoned down in much the same fashion the right of the Conservative Party constrains itself under Cameron in the UK – and for much the same reason; they’re desperate to get in and get rid of a loathed long-serving government. This is a disappointing chink in that armour for them – and perhaps symptomatic of wider feeling in the ALP…
Pretty tired now.
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Brown Reheats Failed Schools Announcement
UPDATE: It seems I was far too kind on our visionary PM. It seems there were many earlier examples of this same policy announcement...
In 1995, David Blunkett, Labour’s education spokesman, said: 'A school identified as failing would be closed and a new school would be reopened on the same site for a new school year. The new school, with a new governing body, new teachers and a new head teacher, would be able to offer pupils a fresh chance for success.’ (The Times, 12 April 1995).
The Labour manifesto in 1997 stated: ‘All Local Education Authorities (LEAs) must demonstrate that every school is improving. For those failing schools unable to improve, ministers will order a 'fresh start' - close the school and start afresh on the same site.’
In 1998 it was announced ‘Schools are to be given a maximum of two years to turn around poor performance under proposals announced by the UK Government. Those which fail to improve sufficiently face closure. They would then either re-open under a new headteacher and governors or remain shut for good, with their pupils transferred to better performing schools’ Education Secretary David Blunkett said: ‘Persistent delay in improvement damages the life chances of the youngsters involved…The new procedures will provide both clarity and certainty for schools whilst making clear that we cannot tolerate consistent failure’ (BBC News online, 2 June 1998).
In 2000, Education Secretary Estelle Morris said: ‘The Government’s approach to tackling failing schools is clearly working for most schools… It is crucial that local education authorities take tough decisions on failing schools.’ (DFEE Press Release, 1 December 2000).
In March 2000, the Government announced ‘in future, where schools over three consecutive years failed to get 5 good GCSE passes for at least 15 per cent of their pupils, they would be considered for a Fresh Start.’ David Blunkett added: ‘Our Fresh Start policy - the closure of a school and the replacement with a new school - is already being used by LEAs to tackle failing schools and is beginning to have an impact.’ (DFEE Press Release 15 March 2000).
Sir Ian Blair Must Go
There is something wrong with a process of accountability that, two years on, continues to prevent the publication of the review of the events leading up to 22 July 2005. Health and Safety legislation is an inappopriate mechanism for scrutinising a counter-terrorism operation - and risks a counter-productive impact on policing. However, the trial has shed light on the serial failures that led to the tragic death of Mr De Menezes. They include failures of organisation, command and operations. The failures were systemic, falling within the clear responsibility of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. His position is now untenable, in light of these findings and the overriding need to restore public confidence. We think the jury is right to say Cressida Dick should not be blamed for this failure. Neither, should the frontline officers, because this was a serial failure of organisation, training, tactics and resourcing. Only one person can be held overall accountable for that.
David Cracknell Leaves Sunday Times
Political Editor of the Sunday Times is one of the plum jobs in the lobby. It would be invidious of me to tip who might get it, so let's do it! If I were the editor of the Sunday Times (and that is a delicious thought, is it not?) my shortlist would consist of Francis Elliott, Ben Brogan, Fraser Nelson, Colin Brown and Patrick O'Flynn. Which, of course, guarantees none of them stand a chance.
Featherstone on LibDem Hustings
Hattip Justin Hinchcliffe
Olly Kendall has written an article on CiF on the dangers of political betting (the activity, not the site) and whether there should be a code of conduct for candidates betting on themselves or their opponents. Read it HERE.
October Stats: Overtaking Guido

Alex Deane: Report from the Aussie Election Day 18
There’s no hiding it. Yesterday was a bad day. There were three main reasons for this:
- Tony Abbott publicly abused a dying man
- Tony Abbott turned up half an hour late to his own debate.
- Tony Abbott audibly swore at his debate opponent.
Tony Abbott is the Health Minister. All this also resulted in no media coverage for our $400 million hospitals plan. We will be hoping that the focus today shifts from Tony Abbott and back onto policy. Or, indeed, anything else.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Living by the Sword
No Election (And No Blogging Today!)
Nadine Dorries Accuses Select Committee
MPs have not been given the opportunity to consider all the evidence that could
have been made available. The facts have been shadowed and the report has been
hijacked by those with powerful vested financial interests in the abortion
industry.
This is controversial stuff. More on Nadine's blog HERE.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Gordon Brown's Trick or Treat
Nick Clegg Support(ed) an EU Constitution Referendum
The real reason, of course, why the government does not want to hold a referendum is the fear that it may lose. It is the same fear that has paralysed Blair on the euro for six long years. It is the same fear that led Peter Hain to camouflage the constitution with comic inaccuracy as nothing more than a "tidying up exercise". It is the same fear which has long restrained New Labour from expressing the courage of its meagre convictions on Europe. And it won't do.
The alternative, now unfolding before us, is infinitely worse: a false assumption that anti-Europeans are democrats, and pro-Europeans are not. By shilly shallying with semantic half-truths about the content of the constitution, and now haughtily dismissing all calls for a referendum, it is New Labour which is, to cite my friend, "playing straight into the hands of the Eurosceptics". By providing the hapless Iain Duncan Smith with a pretext to champion people's democracy, Blair is unwittingly doing more to reinvigorate Euroscepticism than John Redwood could manage in his wildest fantasies. Nothing will do more damage to the pro-European movement than giving room to the suspicion that we have something to hide, that we do not have the "cojones" to carry our argument to the people.
And our argument is strong. The constitution, assuming it emerges roughly in its present draft form, provides ideal ammunition to call the Europhobes' bluff. While it is no mere "tidying up exercise", it is galaxies away from the "blueprint for tyranny" laughably paraded by the Daily Mail...
...The measured modesty of the constitution is precisely what is being obscured by the government's refusal to hold a referendum. In doing so, it has allowed the phobes to shift the argument away from the constitution itself and onto shriller claims about the democratic legitimacy of the whole EU. By forcing the phobes to argue on the substance of the text, a referendum would expose the hollow hysteria of their polemic.
Naive? Perhaps, a little. Inevitably, any referendum campaign is unlikely to be a scholarly examination of the legal content of a complex constitutional tome. It is possible that it will soon escalate into an unconstrained debate about the very place of Britain in the EU - in or out. So be it.
Read the full article HERE. Hattip to LibDem Voice. They know not what they do.
How to Earn £139,000 a Month

Gove on Gordon
Labour Refuses to Back Cut in Trade Union Donations

We greatly regret that these talks have been suspended as a result of the
Conservative Party's unwillingness to negotiate on a draft agreement. We had
understood that all parties had thought in good faith that this draft agreement
was the basis of a comprehensive settlement. We will now take time to reflect on
next steps.
We are disappointed that the trade unions still hold Labour over a barrel. The
unions are running the Labour party from the back seat, giving them control over
Government policy. Labour has rejected a comprehensive cap on donations and
clearly do not want to end the big donor culture which has caused the 'cash for
honours' scandal. Labour just want a backroom deal that gives them taxpayers'
cash without proper reform. This would do nothing to restore public trust in our
democracy.
Why the Milibands Had to Go to America to Adopt
We really need to revisit this issue, and David Miliband ought to take a leading part in the discussions.