political commentator * author * publisher * bookseller * radio presenter * blogger * Conservative candidate * former lobbyist * Jack Russell owner * West Ham United fanatic * Email iain AT iaindale DOT com
Friday, November 05, 2010
Why Has Trade Union Solidarity Diminished?
Yesterday I took part in a fascinating film by former BBC Industrial Correspondent, Nick Jones, which looked at the issue of trade union solidarity and compared the situation today with the 1970s and 1980s.
In the discussion which followed Nick's report, Matt Wrack from the FBU gave a completely different reason for abandoning today's fire strike to that given earlier yesterday evening. The issue of the ability of the London Fire Authority to provide cover wasn't mentioned at all. Instead, he alleged there had been a move on the part of the employers to withdraw the threat of sackings. That will come as news to Brian Coleman who told me the exact opposite on LBC last night. Still, the main thing is, there isn't going to be a strike today, and that has to be a good thing.
What a shame BBC News staff are going ahead with their strike today, though. Most of 5 Live will be off air, thus denying Mehdi Hasan and me the opportunity to lock horns on the Nolan paper review tonight. Such is life :).
UPDATE: David Seymour's book (with Jo Phillips) WHY JOIN A TRADE UNION can be bought HERE.
"Why Has Trade Union Solidarity Diminished?"
ReplyDeleteBecause to a sizeable degree the State elbowed unions out of negotiating terms of employment, holiday entitlements, maternity and paternity pay and all the rest.
Once working conditions had been nationalised in this manner the effectiveness of union representation is automatically diminished. For the worse I reckon. People have had a great deal of personal responsibility removed from their own hands in looking out for their own interests and Unions provide a means to choose to socialise that interest whereas the State doing it socialises it by force.
I find it hilarious on one level that the party the Unions continue to support did them a great deal of damage.
It is indeed a shame the BBC News dept has closed down today. Not the least of which there has been little opportunity to discuss the disgraceful apology over the Geldof money affair. Apart from the fact that charity and government aid money going into Africa merely allows the ruling classes to deploy their various country’s wealth into Mercedes cars and Swiss banks, why should we seek to revive the careers of fading pop stars by supporting their vanity projects?
ReplyDeleteI did however object to the vicious attack on the BBC made by Michael Grade yesterday morning. What a two faced skunk. It would well behove for past D’s G and Chairmen to support public service broadcasting, however institutionally left wing it very obviously is. The despicable way that Labour place men Dyke and Mr Sue Nye kowtowed to the government when challenged by Alistair Campbell was vile especially as Gilligan was 100% right.
These BBC hacks should strike more, BBC Breakfast was far better this morning.
ReplyDeleteSurely BBC news being off air is great, well - news - in itself. News without the BBC's input must be mush more balanced.
ReplyDeleteSres, if you go on the BBC Points of View messageboard dozens of people are saying the same; the BBC breakfast news was so much better this morning for being presented as sombre factual news rather than simpering autocuties trying to impose their personal slant on events.
ReplyDeleteWhy has Trade Union solidarity diminished? Because unions are a waste of time.
ReplyDeleteThe best protection a worker can have are employers chasing his skills. The best protection an employer can have are workers chasing his jobs.
Anything else is an interference that does nothing to improve economies.
I do wish that we would not talk about "sackings" of the firemen. They were not being sacked, simply offered new contracts to sign. those who did not sign would cease to be employed entirely of their own volition.
ReplyDeleteThe talk of how intransigent is Brian Coleman is now the standard tactic for the unions in industrial disputes - they pick on a manager as their demon, the bogeyman. The air hostesses did it with Willy Walsh.
Naturally they are able to whip up many more phone-ins to radio shows than the management or those who are going about their business. I have heard an endless litany of reasons why the changes will affect everything in their whole lives. A great many of those are purely specious.
Nobody is even having their pay cut so not much hardship compared to the number of private sector employees who have had to accepot short-time and certainly not even anywhere near the problems of public servants in Greece and Ireland who have taken large wage cuts.
I think it's wonderful that the BBC journalists are on strike. My only complaint is that they will not be on strike long enough to give others a chance to break in with more impartial offerings! For a further take on this visit http://cork-richardrant.blogspot.com
ReplyDeleteLet's not forget a key couple of facts that has made the trade unions, and Labour, different and more focused individually as organisations today than they were in the 70's and 80's.
ReplyDeleteThen we had high ranking and nationally important people from the trade unions and Labour whose sole job it was to cause disruption and foment discontent, people like Jack Jones who were bought and paid for spies of communist USSR while masquerading as champions of the working man.
Makes you wonder about Bob Crow....
There is no trade union solidarity now as it is now a business for the chosen few to gain and manipulate the dirty necked masses. Much like Labour.