I wrote about Ming Campbell publishing his memoirs in September a few days ago. It seems he had hired a lobby hack to ghost them, but has now decided he needs a different approach and dispensed with their services. Instead, someone who has what is described to me as a more "flowery" approach has been taken on. What can it all mean?
Coming tomorrow: The winner of the Name the Ming Campbell Memoirs Competition
Surely it has to be
ReplyDelete'The Minging Memoirs'
Come on Iain, name names and stop teasing!
ReplyDeleteThe lobby hack in question was a card carrying Lib Dem too...I won't name him or her though he or she made no secret of it.
ReplyDeleteAs he claims to have been a world class runner, surely "From the fast lane to the slow lane"
ReplyDeleteI seem to recall something similar happened with William Hague. He hired a respected lobby hack to write his "official" biography (I won't name him/her either) then changed his mind and went for a fluffy piece of hagiography penned by the lightweight Tory it-girl Jo-Anne Nadler.
ReplyDeleteAs Iain will no doubt know, I'm sure publishers also have some say in such decisions.
Paul, you've got that wrong. Hague had been cooperating with a female journalist from the Yorkshire Post but she never actually got around to writing anything and couldn't get a publisher. I talked to her but she decided not to proceed. it was then that he cooperated with Nadler. I should know - I published the book!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the clarification Iain!
ReplyDeleteI suppose the obvious follow-up question to you as a book publisher is: why was Nadler's book deemed more publishable than the one being planned by the ex-YP journo? And might a similar thing have happened with the Ming memoir?
I will understand if you think you are bound by commercial confidentiality here though....
Paul, that wasn't the case. The YP journalist decide not proceed partly because, as I recall, no publisher could meet her financial expectations. It was nothing to do with one book being more publishable than the other. I would have happily gone ahead with her book.
ReplyDelete