Monday, May 18, 2009

Sign the Petition for a General Election


David Cameron this afternoon launched a national petition calling for an early general election. If you'd like to sign it click HERE.

I wasn't convinced of the benefits of an early election until today. But I think public anger is at such a level that it may be the only way it can be assuaged. I'll be debating the issue with Jessica Asato from Progress on 5 Live Breakfast tomorrow morning at 8.05am. She, naturally, would rather stick needles in her eyes than have an election.

47 comments:

  1. Gimmick!
    Shallow!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That looks more like an attempt to grab data for a mailing list than any serious petition. Why didn't he put it on the No 10 site? Not signed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "That looks more like an attempt to grab data for a mailing list than any serious petition."

    Just don't tick the boxes that say 'pleeze can I haz yr data?' then.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Signed and passed on.

    Will Labour supporters want to sign a petition on the Conservatives' site?

    Perhaps Cameron should make it more widely available and perhaps downloadable for printing and distributing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The expenses row just isn’t going away, so Rip Her To Shreds could not resist one more round of putting the honourable members in the Spotified spotlight.
    This week we’re asking ‘Who’s Sorry Now?’ (Obviously not The Speaker)

    http://www.riphertoshreds.co.uk/the-beat-goes-on/spotified/the-playlist/

    ReplyDelete
  6. What a stunt! He could force an election if he really wanted. This gives the impression he wants one now whilst giving him all the time in the world to bugger about.

    I feel totally let down.

    (PS I still signed it though!)

    ReplyDelete
  7. What a waste of time. Do you think Brown is going to say "Ooh, I see that the Conservatives are calling for a general election: better give them one then"? The leech is going to cling on until May 2010. Cameron would do better to push for that fat pig Martin to oink off.

    Not signed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Signed plus got another to sign it as well!

    Just persuaded another to sign it and have sent them a link!

    Labour Labour Labour - Out Out Out!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Signed.

    Until today I thought a GE now was a crap idea fuelled by the Westminster bubble effect.

    Who would want to go to the country now with all this sh1t flying around?

    The mood swings wildly daily, but I now think nothing will stop the outcry unless people can have their say.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. May 18, 2009 6:16 PM

    You don't get it do you - A Ge in say June/july/august or septemeber gives the parties enough time to get rid of the fat pigs and get rid of Speaker Martin. Both are as important as the other in executing. At the moment there are MPs who are cashing in each month with Mp salaries plus Pension contributions.


    A dissolution of parliament is the only way to stop the troughing and get a cleaner politics.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Teller of TruthMay 18, 2009 6:25 pm

    Come on Dale - tell us....

    Moran or Dorries - who is the more culpable?

    Pick up Craig Murray's challenge - your continued silence suggests guilt on Dorries' part!

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Teller of TruthMay 18, 2009 6:29 pm

    Ooops! I forgot to paste this link - it explains all:

    http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2009/05/dorries_and_dal.html

    ReplyDelete
  14. No election whilst the troughers are in situ....unless Dave wants to throw away seats hand over fist......mackay, kirkbride, hogg, duncan and another dozen others should all be deselected and clean candidates put in place......

    ReplyDelete
  15. Labour sock puppets spotted hosting the socialist skull and bones Flag!

    Labour have nothing constructive anymore to say - they don't want an election because they know the British people hate them for the corruption Labour has created in the last twelve years.

    Labour made this expensive MP enrichment scheme post 1997. It was built on something that was meant to assist memebers.

    When Cabinet members make money at the tax payers expense by claiming 50% more than they pay for council tax you really see that Labour are in it all for themselves!

    ReplyDelete
  16. sinosimon,

    Troughers should be removed from any party - if the parties do not do it then the people will!

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you vote UKIP in the European Elections you will make it more likely that they come ahead of New Labour which makes Gordon's position untenable.
    So if you really, really want to force a General Election vote UKIP.
    Simples!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'll sign it before Christmas

    ReplyDelete
  19. Premier League WolfMay 18, 2009 6:37 pm

    Much as I want to see the back of Brown and his dreadful government at the earliest opportunity I think the next government would be hamstrung from the start if they start off with people like Julie Kirkbride amongst the ranks of backbenchers. Time is needed to deselect the wrongdoers and to appoint new prospective MP's so I am unable to sign this petition at this stage.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Signed. 12 years of Labour has been a disaster.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Liberal Democrats have done nothing to overhaul their party sleaze MPs or Peers. The Liberal Democrats have done nothing and Cleggs platitude on frontbench MPs surrendering any capital gains is not legally binding or enforceable.

    Meanwhile Clegg has left in place a Labour Peer who is as guilty for cashing in on expenses as any other individual in this sorry affair. Lord Rennard is still in his paid chief executive post in the Liberal Democrats - Why?

    Then there is the Liberal Democrat £2 Million plus loan that Michael Brown stole from investors.

    Labour have left their cabinet sleaze balls in place and the Labour MPs caught claiming for non-existant mortgages are still drawing their salary.

    A dissolution is the only way to clean the pigs out of the sty!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Surely we all want the crooks to be deselected first before we have an election.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm glad the penny has dropped with you at last Iain.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I signed it but I bet you would get a lot more signers if:

    1) It was not on the Conservatives website
    2) It didn't look like an attempt to harvest voter's details for marketing purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Barcelona BillMay 18, 2009 6:50 pm

    I have already signed Craig Murray's petition asking the Queen to dissolve parliament.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Why won't Dave just stop p!ss!ng about and table a motion of no confidence.

    Call me old fashioned, but that is exactly the sort of thing the Opposition are supposed to do.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Signed...I know that some of the porkers might still be there but above all else I want rid of this complete shower of socialist shite...so I`ll take a chance thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  28. is there any point? There are nearly 60000 on the no 10 epetition.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Surely all troughing snouts should be exposed then deselected first.

    Far from seizing the moral high ground , this just looks desperate and a bit cheap.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The current petition on the No10 site has shown that it is useless as a vehicle for mass numbers. At the fastest rate it ever showed, of 10k a day, it would take 1 year to reach 3M votes.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Or if you prefer a nonpartisan alternative: http://tinyurl.com/r9j8zn

    ReplyDelete
  32. Waste of Time.

    Preaching to the converted.

    Get the petition on the Number10.gov.uk e-petitions, and it might have some use.

    [Don't hold your breath though. 60,000+ signed urging Brown to go, but he's just ignored it]

    ReplyDelete
  33. Is this a precedent? Because I'm sure we would have had hundreds of thousands of signatures requiring a dissolution of Parliament in April 1990 when the Poll Tax started.

    Perhaps David Cameron can tell us what the threshold is before he will say that the people have demanded a dissolution and so the Prime Minister would oblige. Then he would be bound by the same threshold if he were to be Prime Minister, would he not?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Not a lot of point if we have only the same candidates to vote for.

    Whenever it comes, I do hope there are a lot of independent candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  35. UGH! That logo! Cameron's "butcher's apron" "no freedom for England" flag! I really dislike the British flag now.

    ReplyDelete
  36. nO. It wants too much info. Put up a petiition on the no. 10- web as someone suggested.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Since Cameron has without doubt broken the expenses rules, why is his party not taking action against him? Until he can explain how wisteria impedes his parliamentary duties, Cameron does not deserve an election, and he certainly does not deserve to win it. Unfortunately, unlike the Labour Party which seems to be taking a central line of deselection for those who've broken the rules, the Tories appear to be leaving it to Cameron and the Associations - which makes his position rather more secure than it should be! Why has he not yet called for any deselections - and why not his own?!

    ReplyDelete
  38. "Perhaps David Cameron can tell us what the threshold is before he will say that the people have demanded a dissolution and so the Prime Minister would oblige."

    Excellent point. If it's any guide, the previous petition, for a referendum on Lisbon, has garnered a staggering 2,530 names in just three weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Perhaps the Queen will assist?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Is this a misstep from DC? He'll probably come to rue that he encouraged this kind of extra-parliamentary quasi-democratic gimmick.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Brit.in.AussieMay 19, 2009 1:12 am

    Well at least Iain Dale shows his traditional political consistency by arguing for snap elections to "solve" political crises but only, of course, when the Tories are not in power.

    What would have happened had such a snap election been held as a result of political crisis following Argentina invading the Falklands? I think we may have found that the Blessed Margaret's political career might have been a mere coda between two very socialist Labour Governments.

    What possible consistency could there be between Iain's opportunistic calling for snap general elections now and his previous "campaign" for fixed term parliaments? None at all.

    But next week, all of this would have been ludicrous posturing will have been forgotten, except by those few of us with memories longer than the average goldfish.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Can't wait for a GE so we can get at rid of this Government once and for all! I've signed!

    ReplyDelete