tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post271620016188567131..comments2024-03-04T17:54:32.559+00:00Comments on Iain Dale's Diary: When to Ask Ann Widdecombe to Dance...Iain Dalehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03270146219458384372noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-80210358238111409152008-07-31T23:22:00.000+01:002008-07-31T23:22:00.000+01:00"You anonynmous fool.I never said Widdecombe's 'so..."You anonynmous fool.<BR/><BR/>I never said Widdecombe's 'something of the night' had anything to do with Paxman. The inference was that Widdecome must love Paxman because he comprehensively humilated Howard, whom she clearly wished to see humiliated and exposed."<BR/><BR/>You really are a dimwit. You should keep your feeble-minded meanderings to yourself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-51854017456745530772008-07-31T16:46:00.000+01:002008-07-31T16:46:00.000+01:00What this post doesn't tell you is that, although ...What this post doesn't tell you is that, although "Widdy" is a "big boned" girl, she could walk under a coffee table in a top hat. So unless you are under about 4Ft 6ins dancing with her could be a nightmare......Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-67608931594267507822008-07-31T15:15:00.000+01:002008-07-31T15:15:00.000+01:00wost. person. ever.wost. person. ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-386593924647842492008-07-31T14:35:00.000+01:002008-07-31T14:35:00.000+01:00Anonymous said..."The inference was that Widdecome...<B>Anonymous said...</B><BR/><BR/>"The inference was that Widdecome must love Paxman because he comprehensively humilated Howard"<BR/><BR/>Clearly, it was not.<BR/><BR/>Hint: don't try to do subtle. Or clever. It's so not you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-11304346497397532402008-07-31T13:10:00.000+01:002008-07-31T13:10:00.000+01:00After imbibing about fourteen pints, I think.After imbibing about fourteen pints, I think.Unsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08307116169498533047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-34554622263089923532008-07-31T13:04:00.000+01:002008-07-31T13:04:00.000+01:00"George W Bush is the politician she most admires"...<I>"George W Bush is the politician she most admires"</I><BR/><BR/>I could never stand her, especially because of her views on foxhunting, but she has gone up in my estimation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-16052547006156818702008-07-31T12:13:00.000+01:002008-07-31T12:13:00.000+01:00"George W Bush is the politician she most admires"..."George W Bush is the politician she most admires"<BR/><BR/>she's gone up in my estimations,<BR/>well said anne widdecombe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-57528212058431035892008-07-31T11:59:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:59:00.000+01:00You anonynmous fool.I never said Widdecombe's 'som...You anonynmous fool.<BR/><BR/>I never said Widdecombe's 'something of the night' had anything to do with Paxman. The inference was that Widdecome must love Paxman because he comprehensively humilated Howard, whom she clearly wished to see humiliated and exposed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-576991562424917102008-07-31T11:45:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:45:00.000+01:00"George W Bush is the politician she most admires"..."<I>George W Bush is the politician she most admires</I>"<BR/><BR/>I used to really like Ann WiddecombePhilipahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03440234602399886097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-10091574611509518862008-07-31T11:43:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:43:00.000+01:00Anonymous said... "Paxman? Must because of the spe...Anonymous said... <BR/>"Paxman? Must because of the spectacular humiliation he meted out on Michael Howard. 'Something of the night' has entered the political lexicon."<BR/><BR/>Ann Widdecombe's "something of the night" remark had nothing to do with Paxman. She said it in Parliament.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-54751799848171544222008-07-31T11:39:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:39:00.000+01:00When I buy a newspaper or magazine I take for gran...When I buy a newspaper or magazine I take for granted that there'll always be some contributors I'll absolutely loathe and some angles on stories I'll totally disagree with. When the tipping point has been reached and I loathe more than I like - as happened with the Guardian and the Spectator post-Boris - I'll change to another paper/magazine. The trouble with Total Politics is that you've started off with a tipping point. I would never have anything to do with a journal that featured input from Sami Shakrabatri and Denis McShane. I think you even give space to that world class irritant, Yasmin Alibi Brown. Who exactly are you trying to appeal to?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-79988277676850093722008-07-31T11:37:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:37:00.000+01:00G W Bush??Any admiration I had for Widdecombe has ...G W Bush??<BR/><BR/>Any admiration I had for Widdecombe has now vanished....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-10103523357319935042008-07-31T11:27:00.000+01:002008-07-31T11:27:00.000+01:00You are in desperate need of a sub-edit for Daily ...You are in desperate need of a sub-edit for Daily Politico.<BR/><BR/>'Nassar'<BR/><BR/>'Artic' (3 times, so it can't be a typo).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6214838.post-74568512308399389102008-07-31T10:30:00.000+01:002008-07-31T10:30:00.000+01:00Paxman?Must because of the spectacular humiliation...Paxman?<BR/><BR/>Must because of the spectacular humiliation he meted out on Michael Howard. 'Something of the night' has entered the political lexicon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com